![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/06\/16-1024x576.jpg\")
Dr. Tatiane de Azevedo Rubio<\/a>‘s interest in scientific research dates back to her undergraduate years. She earned a degree in Physical Education from UNIFEV<\/strong> in 2008 and later graduated in Education from FACON<\/strong> in 2018. “I have always been interested in research. I’ve always enjoyed this field and always wanted to become a university professor,” she recalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Her path, however, was far from linear. After working in higher education, Tatiane stepped away from academia for nearly four years due to motherhood and a period of depression. Even while away from research, her desire to return never faded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The opportunity arose unexpectedly during a lecture organized by the Cardiology Society<\/strong>. There she met physician-scientist Juan Carlos Yugar Toledo<\/a>, who would later become her master’s advisor at the S\u00e3o Jos\u00e9 do Rio Preto School of Medicine<\/strong> (FAMERP), where she completed her master’s degree in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “It was a return to the field and an opportunity to learn everything again. I had been away for a long time, and many things were completely new to me,” she says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Her return to research also marked her first in-depth encounter with a topic that would ultimately define her scientific career: resistant hypertension<\/mark><\/strong>. Although she had previously worked on hypertension during her undergraduate studies, she soon realized that resistant hypertension represented a much more complex clinical challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “I had no idea how complex resistant and refractory hypertension<\/strong> really were,” she recalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Following this experience, Tatiane joined the research group coordinated by Professor Heitor Moreno Junior<\/a> at the School of Medical Sciences of the University of Campinas<\/strong> (Unicamp), where he served as co-advisor during her master’s degree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Professor Moreno later became her Ph.D. advisor in the Graduate Program in Pharmacology at Unicamp<\/a>. Her doctoral research sought to understand how alterations in the autonomic nervous system, inflammatory mechanisms, and hormonal factors interact in patients with resistant and refractory hypertension\u2014conditions that continue to challenge physicians and researchers because of their complexity and difficulty to control.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Now a newly graduated Ph.D., Tatiane represents a new generation of scientists dedicated to unraveling the mechanisms underlying the most severe forms of arterial hypertension. Her journey also illustrates how science is built through perseverance, reinvention, and returning to what one believes is a true vocation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Arterial hypertension<\/mark><\/strong> is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide and one of the leading risk factors for heart attack, stroke, kidney failure, and other cardiovascular diseases. In simple terms, it occurs when blood pressure levels remain persistently elevated<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Blood pressure is the force exerted by circulating blood against the walls of the arteries<\/strong>. It is measured using two values. The first, known as systolic blood pressure<\/mark><\/strong>, represents the pressure generated when the heart contracts to pump blood. The second, called diastolic blood pressure<\/mark><\/strong>, reflects the pressure in the arteries when the heart relaxes between heartbeats and, therefore, it is lower than systolic pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Just as we measure distance in meters (m) and weight in grams (g), blood pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). When someone says their blood pressure is “120 over 80,” for example, they are referring to a systolic pressure of approximately 120 mmHg and a diastolic pressure of 80 mmHg.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Currently, the optimal blood pressure target is below 120\/80 mmHg. Values above 140\/90 mmHg are considered consistent with a diagnosis of hypertension.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In most cases, the disease can be managed through lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medications. However, treatment becomes considerably more challenging for two groups of patients: those with resistant hypertension<\/mark><\/strong> and those with refractory hypertension<\/mark><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Resistant hypertension<\/strong> is characterized by the inability to achieve adequate blood pressure control despite appropriate treatment. These patients typically take three or more antihypertensive medications<\/strong>, preferably including a thiazide diuretic<\/strong> such as hydrochlorothiazide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even while receiving the maximum recommended doses\u2014or the highest doses they can tolerate\u2014patients with resistant hypertension continue to present elevated blood pressure levels after at least six months of medical follow-up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Refractory hypertension<\/strong> represents an even more severe condition. These patients require five or more antihypertensive medications<\/strong> and still fail to reach target blood pressure levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Several physiological systems work together to regulate blood pressure, forming an extensive network of mechanisms that continuously interact with one another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “We need to consider the human body as a complex organism<\/mark><\/strong>, full of variables that are constantly interacting,” Tatiane explains. “If one system isn’t functioning properly, another tries to compensate. By the time we recognize that a patient is ill, many of these changes have often been developing for years.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n These interactions among multiple physiological systems are essential for proper blood pressure regulation because blood pressure is naturally expected to fluctuate in response to different stimuli<\/strong>. For example, our blood pressure rises when we become angry, consume excessive salt, exercise, or experience fear. Notice that these are entirely different types of stimuli: emotional, dietary, and physical, all influencing blood pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since numerous stimuli affect blood pressure, multiple regulatory systems are required to coordinate this complex network of responses<\/strong>. It is similar to a family dog cared for by several members of the household. One person feeds the dog, another takes it for walks, another sleeps beside it, and so on. Each person’s role is essential to keeping the dog healthy and happy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Blood pressure rising or falling in response to different stimuli is not only normal, it is vital for survival. A simple example occurs when someone stands up from a chair. At that moment, blood pressure must briefly increase to ensure that blood flow to the brain remains adequate. When this response fails, a condition known as orthostatic hypotension<\/mark><\/strong> occurs: vision may dim, dizziness develops, and in severe cases, the person may even faint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If this has ever happened to you, there’s no need to worry. Mild dizziness is common when the body takes a little longer to adjust blood pressure after standing. In healthy individuals, however, the situation quickly stabilizes. In people with hypertension, this adaptive mechanism may be impaired. Their blood pressure rises as expected but may remain elevated for much longer than it should.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “Sometimes people say their blood pressure is fluctuating. But the real question is: fluctuating by how much? Some degree of fluctuation is both normal and necessary. The problem arises when the body loses its ability to readapt appropriately,” Tatiane explains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For decades, researchers believed that one of the main causes of resistant hypertension was sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity<\/mark><\/strong>, in other words, an overactive sympathetic nervous system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We previously explained the sympathetic nervous system<\/mark><\/strong> in the article “New Catecholamines: The Discovery That Challenges Physiology Textbooks (Part 1)<\/a>.”<\/em> You can refer to that feature for a more detailed explanation. In short, the sympathetic nervous system is responsible for preparing the body to respond to stress and situations that require heightened alertness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But is that explanation sufficient? That was the question that guided Dr. Tatiane’s doctoral research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While analyzing data from patients with hypertension, Dr. Tatiane noticed that the findings did not align with the traditional theory. Both the physiological components associated with the sympathetic nervous system and those linked to the parasympathetic nervous system were reduced<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We also discussed the parasympathetic nervous system<\/mark><\/strong> in “New Catecholamines: The Discovery That Challenges Physiology Textbooks (Part 1)<\/a>.”<\/em> Essentially, it is the branch of the nervous system responsible for promoting rest and recovery, helping lower blood pressure after periods of physical exertion or stress. In many ways, it functions as the counterpart to the sympathetic nervous system.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words, there did not appear to be an increase in sympathetic activity. Instead, sympathetic activity itself was reduced. The key finding was that parasympathetic activity, which normally counterbalances sympathetic activity, had declined even more dramatically, creating the impression that the sympathetic system had become overactive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This observation led to the first scientific publication of her doctoral research<\/a>. From there, the project evolved toward a broader understanding: the problem was not confined to a single blood pressure regulatory system but rather involved the extensive network connecting all of them<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Returning to the family dog analogy, imagine that one family member stopped cleaning up after the dog because they became ill and bedridden. Another person took over the responsibility before leaving for work, but since this task was not part of their usual routine, they frequently ran late.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Eventually, this began affecting their job, creating stress and tension within the household. Frustrated, they refused to continue taking on the responsibility. Over time, the increased stress and inadequate care also affected the dog, which became anxious, stopped eating properly, and no longer wanted to go for walks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It would be difficult to identify a single person responsible for the dog’s declining health. Was it the first family member who became sick? The second person who struggled to adapt? The rest of the family, who failed to reorganize their responsibilities? The real problem lies in the inability of the system as a whole to adapt to a new reality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The analogy is admittedly exaggerated, even somewhat tragic, but it illustrates how changes in one part of a system can ultimately affect the health of the entire system<\/strong>. Blood pressure regulation appears to work in much the same way: when one physiological system becomes impaired, the others are also affected through a complex web of interactions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The observation that multiple physiological systems appeared to be altered simultaneously led Dr. Tatiane and her collaborators to an important conclusion: perhaps blood pressure regulation is not merely a complicated phenomenon, but a complex one.<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At first glance, the distinction may seem purely semantic. For the researchers, however, the difference between “complex” and “complicated”<\/mark><\/strong> is fundamental.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “A complex system<\/strong> is one in which everything is interconnected. We cannot clearly identify where something begins, where it ends, or what caused what,” Dr. Tatiane explains. “A complicated system<\/strong>, on the other hand, may be difficult to understand, but it is still possible to establish clear cause-and-effect relationships.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n During the interview, she used a simple analogy to illustrate this distinction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Cooking a pasta dish is a complex process<\/strong>. Even if someone gives you their exact recipe, your result will probably not be identical to theirs. Numerous variables influence the final outcome: the brand of pasta, the cooking time, the amount of salt, the power of the stove, and many others. No two pasta dishes will ever be exactly the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Building a LEGO castle, by contrast, is a complicated process<\/strong>. It may require patience and skill, but if everyone follows the same instruction manual using the same pieces, the final result will be virtually identical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Understanding that blood pressure regulation is complex rather than merely complicated is much more than a matter of word choice.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n For decades, hypertension has been studied primarily using linear mathematical models<\/mark><\/strong>, which are highly effective for analyzing systems considered complicated<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Within this framework, researchers examined factors such as sympathetic nervous system activity, kidney function, hormonal regulation, inflammation, and arterial stiffness separately, searching for direct cause-and-effect relationships, as though it were possible to identify a single culprit responsible for hypertension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This approach produced fundamental advances in our understanding of the disease and contributed to the development of numerous medications that have saved millions of lives. However, it also has important limitations. By analyzing each mechanism in isolation, it becomes much more difficult to understand how these systems interact over time.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Viewing blood pressure as a complex system aims precisely to broaden this perspective by using new mathematical tools capable of analyzing the multiple interactions that occur simultaneously within the body and that may influence the progression of arterial hypertension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If blood pressure is indeed a complex system<\/mark><\/strong>, an obvious question arises: how can something so full of interacting components be studied? To answer that question, researchers increasingly turned to chaos theory<\/mark><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite its intimidating name, chaos theory is not about disorder or randomness. Rather, it seeks to understand highly organized systems that are so complex that even very small changes can produce consequences that are difficult to predict<\/strong>. The field gained prominence through the work of meteorologist Edward Lorenz<\/a> during the 1960s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These discoveries led to an important scientific realization: complex systems cannot be adequately understood using linear mathematical models<\/mark><\/strong> alone. Linear models establish a direct connection (a straight line) between cause and effect.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words, linear models are excellent tools for studying complicated systems but are insufficient for interpreting complex ones<\/strong>. Researchers needed mathematical methods capable of describing networks of interactions that continuously adapt and reorganize themselves. It was within this context that chaos theory became firmly established.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the case of resistant hypertension, the need for nonlinear approaches has been highlighted repeatedly by researchers over the years. “We have many scientific papers stating that nonlinear analysis should be used, but almost no one actually uses it,” Dr. Tatiane says. “It’s genuinely difficult, but I believe we managed to do it.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n She also highlights one of the study’s most important findings: “We observed that the more complex the system is, the healthier it appears to be. The more linear and predictable it becomes, the more strongly it is associated with disease.<\/strong>“<\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words, a healthy heart exhibits a rich diversity of physiological patterns and responses. In patients with hypertension, particularly those with more severe forms of the disease, that diversity appears to diminish progressively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Although it may seem counterintuitive, an organism that behaves in an overly predictable manner is not necessarily a healthy one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Imagine an experienced driver navigating a busy road. They continuously adjust their speed, steering, and following distance as traffic conditions change. Now imagine a car capable of maintaining only one speed and one trajectory. Although its behavior would be far more predictable, it would also be much more likely to become involved in an accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A similar phenomenon appears to occur in hypertension. As the systems responsible for regulating blood pressure lose their flexibility, the cardiovascular system becomes increasingly rigid and less capable of responding appropriately to the constantly changing demands of the environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reaching these conclusions, however, required overcoming an obstacle rarely encountered in the health sciences: mathematics<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “During the first year of my Ph.D., I came across a mathematical method that claimed it could determine whether a system was chaotic or not. The problem was that I had absolutely no idea how to calculate it,” Dr. Tatiane recalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The challenge was not simply the mathematics itself. Many of the methods used in nonlinear dynamics were originally developed for fields such as physics, engineering, and meteorology. They are rarely presented in a way that is accessible to healthcare professionals.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Some of the first calculations performed during the project relied on software developed decades ago by an North American researcher. To run on modern computers, the program even required emulating a Windows 95 operating environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For this reason, the dissertation pursued not only a better understanding of resistant hypertension but also a practical objective: making these mathematical tools more accessible to clinical research<\/strong>. After all, a method capable of revealing important information about cardiovascular health is of limited value if only mathematicians know how to use it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The next challenge is to transform these sophisticated calculations into practical tools that physicians and researchers can incorporate into their daily work<\/strong>. If that becomes possible, chaos theory may evolve from being a fascinating mathematical concept into a valuable ally in understanding and treating resistant hypertension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the best-known concepts in chaos theory is the butterfly effect<\/mark><\/strong>. Meteorologist Edward Lorenz observed that small differences in the initial conditions of a system can lead to dramatically different outcomes over time<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This insight gave rise to his famous metaphor that the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil could, under certain circumstances, contribute to the formation of a tornado in Texas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The statement should not be interpreted literally. Lorenz’s point was that, in complex systems, seemingly insignificant changes can trigger major consequences<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Dr. Tatiane, this concept helps explain why some patients with resistant hypertension experience remarkable improvements following what appear to be relatively minor changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In clinical practice, this means that the solution is not always to prescribe additional medications. Sometimes, a seemingly small detail is precisely the missing piece needed to restore balance to the entire system.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n She recalls the case of a patient whose blood pressure remained elevated despite repeated adjustments to her treatment. When laboratory tests revealed extremely high sodium levels, the clinical team initially suspected a laboratory error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After a more in-depth conversation, however, Dr. Tatiane uncovered something unexpected. The patient insisted that her diet was normal and that she did not consume much salt. During the consultation, Tatiane decided to ask a more specific question: “When you go grocery shopping, how many bags of salt do you buy each month?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n The answer was surprising: two bags every month. From that moment on, the patient received more detailed counseling about sodium intake. One month later, her blood pressure was under control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This case illustrates one of the central ideas behind the research: when dealing with complex systems, understanding the details can be just as important as seeing the big picture. Sometimes, a small change made at precisely the right point can produce far greater effects than we might expect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Throughout her doctoral research, Tatiane worked at the intersection of two disciplines that rarely communicate easily with one another: medicine and mathematics<\/strong>. On one side were patients struggling to control their blood pressure. On the other were sophisticated mathematical analyses capable of revealing patterns invisible to traditional methods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For her, however, research is meaningful only if it bridges that gap. “There’s no point in staying in the lab developing extremely difficult mathematical analyses if our patients don’t ultimately benefit from the knowledge we generate,” she says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Beyond producing new scientific knowledge, Dr. Tatiane believes that science should serve as a tool for social transformation. “I love theory, but I also believe we need to be agents of change. We change the way people think little by little, one grain at a time, by sharing knowledge.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n This perspective captures the central message of her research. Understanding resistant hypertension as a complex system requires new ways of thinking, new analytical tools, and new scientific questions. Above all, however, it requires ensuring that the knowledge generated in laboratories and universities ultimately reaches the people who live with the disease every day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The research described in this article was supported by the S\u00e3o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Grant Nos. 21\/04863-0<\/strong> and 23\/10992-2<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This feature article was also produced with the support of the S\u00e3o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil, Grant No. 25\/17158-3<\/strong>. The opinions, hypotheses, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAPESP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Arterial Hypertension<\/a><\/strong> (DOI: 10.1590\/1413-81232020256.26972018)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Brazilian Guidelines on Arterial Hypertension<\/a><\/strong> (DOI: 10.36660\/abc.20201238)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Resistant Hypertension<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Refractory Hypertension<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Research article proposing a new framework for interpreting arterial hypertension parameters<\/a><\/strong> (DOI: 10.1038\/s41371-025-01028-2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Chaos Theory<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Health and the Complexity Paradigm<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhen blood pressure remains uncontrolled<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Searching for patterns within apparent chaos<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/06\/18-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nRethinking Sympathetic Nervous System Activity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Complex Is Not the Same as Complicated<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/06\/20-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nWhen Chaos Helps Explain Health<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/06\/22-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nThe Challenge of the Mathematics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Butterfly Effect of Blood Pressure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/06\/23-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nFrom Theory to Real Life<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.blogs.unicamp.br\/farmacoemfoco\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/303\/2026\/02\/Design-sem-nome-3-1024x1024.png\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n